Queens Jewish Link
Connecting the Queens Jewish Community 
Monday morning’s terrorist attack in Yerushalayim was horrendous. A custodian in a yeshivah, a newly married oleh, a yeshivah bachur, and a middle-aged woman were among those killed. Thankfully, a yeshivah student with a gun and an off-duty soldier from the chareidi brigade were able to “neutralize” the terrorists.
So, Macron (France), Starmer (England), Carney (Canada), and Albanese (Australia) all say they have intentions of recognizing a Palestinian state if the Gaza war is not over by September. They all claim that the Two-State Solution is the only solution to the crisis in the Middle East.
The New York Times has become an unrelenting source of criticism of the State of Israel. Why? What did Israel do to The Times that it deserves such treatment?
Retired Major General Gershon Hacohen, commander of the Gush Katif Disengagement, now admits that the withdrawal was a huge mistake. Indeed, he currently says that October 7 would not have happened had there been no withdrawal from Gush Katif in 2005. Numerous other supporters of the Disengagement have admitted it was a colossal error.
Keir Starmer, Prime Minister of Great Britain, and Emmanuel Macron, President of France, have distinguished themselves as being naïve leaders on the world scene. They have both announced their intention to recognize a Palestinian state. They both ignore the fact that such a move rewards Hamas for its terrorism and disincentivizes Hamas from seeking peace. Hamas has, indeed, suddenly stopped going to the negotiating table once these intentions were made known. Why should they? If they hold out any further, they will reap even greater rewards.
Last week, Agudah MK Yitzchak Goldknopf, addressing the tension between the dati leumi crowd and the chareidi crowd, made a devastating statement in an interview with Makor Rishon:
