News

By the time this column appears, you will probably know the result of the election for Mayor. But even before the results are in, and viewing the situation from thousands of miles away, there are already some observations I want to make.

There are many former New Yorkers who feel connected to the city and want to weigh in on the mayoral election, but as they cannot vote where they do not live, they called on their family members and friends in the boroughs, donated, and canvassed for their preferred candidates. Having lived most of my life in Queens and commuting to the borough daily for work, I could not sit out the most consequential election in the city’s history.

Democrats have largely surrendered to the antisemitic left that many on the right pushed back against, including the lunatic fringe in the GOP tent.

(Nov. 4, 2025 / JNS) Recent events have been an object lesson in the basic truth of the “horseshoe theory” of politics. The theory argues that the far left and the far right are almost always closer to each other in their ideas and even their tactics than either is to the political center and the people who are presumably on the same side of the great issues of the day. Rather than a linear continuum, the political alignment is, in effect, a horseshoe-shaped diagram.

With his election as mayor of New York increasingly likely, the Democratic candidate is willing to finesse every issue except his opposition to the existence of a Jewish state

(Oct. 17, 2025 / JNS) With less than a week until Election Day in New York City, it’s clear that the hopes for preventing the election of Zohran Mamdani to be the next mayor are dwindling. That means it’s time to stop pretending that it won’t happen. Instead, what is needed most now is a sober assessment of how Jewish residents of the five boroughs will be affected by having an openly antisemitic mayor of the greatest Jewish city outside of Israel.

During Barack Obama’s floundering re-election campaign in 2012, a strategy was formed that would ultimately rip the country apart. Knowing that the “unity” message of 2008 rang hollow after a few short years of his administration, Obama shifted tactics and created the “coalition of the dispossessed.” Basically, he proclaimed everyone to be victims and then told them he would be their savior. This mentality has gripped an entire generation and has made victimhood the most powerful political currency in America.

In recent weeks, a clear and unexpected shift has emerged: Individuals who were once among Andrew Cuomo’s most vocal critics have begun recalibrating their positions—not to offer an explicit endorsement, but to provide strategic support at a pivotal moment. This development underscores a fundamental reality: The stakes in this election transcend personal loyalties and individual preferences. Curtis Sliwa remains a cherished ally and confidant within our community, and his ability to forge genuine connections with Jewish New Yorkers is unquestionable. Yet affection alone cannot substitute for a realistic path to victory. Those who truly understand what is at stake for the future of this city must acknowledge a blunt fact: Andrew Cuomo is the only viable option remaining.